Page 5 - Combined_26_OCR

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure No. Tit -J ! (D Pa QQ O

VERTICAL STABILIZER Al© REAR DECK AIRFCI
LOCATIONS AND SIZES

DIMENSIONAL DATA FOR RECOMI-ENDED REAR DEC

LIFT AMD DRAG CHARACTERISTICS OF REC01
REAR DECK AIRFOIL

DIMENSIONAL DATA FOR RECOMMENDED TLJIIT VERTICAL
STABILIZERS .................................................. 12

LIFT AND DRAG CHARACTERISTICS OF RECOT
TWIN VERTICAL C/2 ABILIZSRS 13

c " o E 0
• d
AIRFOIL AND TWIN TERTIC STABILIZERS
Horsepower Required and axial Fore e Coe ch c h •H lent vs.
Body Rake Angle . . . . J - p
Lift Force vs. Body Rak c..' .angle • _f - l
Axial Force Coefficient vs. Angle of law |—i V O
Lift Force vs. Angle of Yaw . .................... ........................ J ~ < J i—i
Side Force vs. Angle of law C O

AIRFOIL O
Korsopowo 5" r - d hO ired and Axial rorce o oefficient v 00
P
Body Rake H
o no xo
Lift Fore e v s td .-JS' Angle O
ii’c rorc D C v s £ - - > o u a - ; C D aw . o no H

‘ - j RECOMMENDED TWIN VERTICAL

Axial rorce o oefficient vs. Angle of raw no
Lift Force vs . Angle of law . . . . . no no ro £1-10
Side Force vs • Angle of Yaw ................................
EFFECT OF REAR BECK AIRFOIL
(Wind Tunnel Results)
Horsepower Required and Axial F or Q © Coeffic lent vs.
Body Rake Angle C \J
Lift Force, vs. Body Rake Angle C \J
iamd
Axial Force Coefficient vs. Ang • • • • • (\J
Lift Force vs. Angle of law . . C\l
o-co
10 T'.fpri ir M
■LUU i i. >
(Wind Tunnel Results)
Horsepow C D h 0 quired and Axial orce Ooe < H
Body Rak C D le.............................. 30

EFFECT OF VERTICAL STABILIZERS
(Wind Tunnel Results)
Axial Force Coefficient vs. Angle of aw H
Lift Force vs. Angle of Yaw . . . . 0J Wo VJ no
Side Force vs. Angle of Yaw . . . . lo

3